| 摘 要： |
After using Nuffield and Leyland tractors for many years (Nuffield DM4, DM3, 460, 1060, 1042, 465 and Leyland 384, 285 and 2100), the question I'd like to ask other readers is has anyone ever run a 1060 and a 465 side-by-side? I did so for several years and found the 1060 had a far superior wheel grip. So I'm wondering if anyone else would like to comment on this point? I feel that Nuffield got the balance all wrong, shifting the fuel tank to the front and lengthening the tractor. I could never see any other reason for the loss of wheel grip. In the 465's favour, though, I have to say that it coped better with heavy, mounted implements.
在使用了多年纳菲尔德（Nuffield）和利兰（Leyland）拖拉机之后（包括纳菲尔德DM4、DM3、460、1060、1042、465，以及利兰384、285和2100），我想向其他读者提出一个问题：有人曾将1060和465并排驾驶过吗？我这样做了好几年，发现1060的轮胎抓地力明显更优。因此，我想知道是否还有其他人对此发表看法？我认为纳菲尔德在平衡设计上出了问题，把油箱移到了前方，使拖拉机整体变长。我始终无法理解为何轮胎抓地力会下降。不过，就465而言，我必须承认它在应对重型安装式农具方面表现得更好。 |
京公网安备 11010202009788